scottplen Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 heres my wurttemburg NCO bar with Gold bravery medal in believe 18 ct gold marked 333 on loop
Schießplatzmeister Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 Hello Scott:What a beautiful bar (as all of yours are)! Thank you for sharing it with us.To clarify, a "333" mark is for 333/1000 parts gold. This tranlates into 8/24 on the carat scale. Thus, the medal is approximately 8 carat gold. This is the last type that was issued.It is amazing that W?rttemberg issued medals with gold in them right up to the end of the war!Best regards,"SPM"
dond Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 A beautiful bar. Note it doesn't have the wreath for the gold medal since it was self explanitory what the awards were.
scottplen Posted April 21, 2008 Author Posted April 21, 2008 hellothanks for info on 333 and yes all bars are mine I had over 75- 100 bars at one time but sold most off !!!!
pinpon590 Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 (edited) To clarify, a "333" mark is for 333/1000 parts gold. This tranlates into 8/24 on the carat scale. Thus, the medal is approximately 8 carat gold. This is the last type that was issued."SPM"Hello ! I have also one wurtemberg gold bravey medal. Are they all marked "333", or this mark is only for the last type ? (weight of the medal : 13,7g)Mine is mark "800" on the ring ! So, a fake ? An older model ?? I will try to take a photo as soon as possible !Thank you gentlemen's ! Edited April 21, 2008 by pinpon590
Guest Rick Research Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 800 is a silver mark, so I'd guess your's is a jeweller's copy from between the wars.
Schießplatzmeister Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 Hello again:A great question. These medals were at the first part of WWI struck in 14 carat gold (585/1000). I do not recall off-hand if these were marked "585" on the ring or not. However, to the best of my recollection, they were marked thusly.All gilded-silver medals are supposedly "copies" as they were not issued (as Rick mentioned). But "copy" in this instance means something worn by the actual recipient, and not something made last week (although undoubtedly some folks have gotten creative and started gilding silver medals to increase the "value"). To me, the "800" mark on the ring is a sign that this is an older "copy". I image that it was not uncommon for a recipient to keep his genuine gold medal at home in the case and to wear a silver-gilt medal on his mounted bar.The gold medals were rather generously awarded (compared to the "gold class" awards of the other Kingdoms). I have seen cast copies of the "333" gold medals, so beware when looking to purchase one.Best regards,"SPM"Hello ! I have also one wurtemberg gold bravey medal. Are they all marked "333", or this mark is only for the last type ? (weight of the medal : 13,7g)Mine is mark "800" on the ring ! So, a fake ? An older model ?? I will try to take a photo as soon as possible !Thank you gentlemen's !
Chip Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 dond,Wonderful set. Thanks for showing it. The little document is really nice.Chip
VtwinVince Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Nice bar, Scott. I hate to be a nag, but I think we need a separate thread on the correct spelling of Wuerttemberg.
Wild Card Posted April 24, 2008 Posted April 24, 2008 Gentlemen,For your consideration. This medal appears to be struck from the same dies as my ?.333? but is of higher quality.
Wild Card Posted April 24, 2008 Posted April 24, 2008 And it is marked ?986? on the rim next to the ?se. I have always been of the impression that this is a first issue while the ?333?s? are second issue. Any ideas or comments are most welcome.Regards,Wild Card
scottplen Posted April 24, 2008 Author Posted April 24, 2008 hello I have only seen 333s on them but I think you may be right as stated the earlier pieces in purer gold!I have had two in my collection over yrs and both had 333 I think any marked 800 as a silver gilt piece is a repacement piece by a jewler for order bar or a fake!!!! seen a few of them out there ! but 1st time on this mark ! And sorry for my spelling in any of my posts !!! to many lost days in childhood dreaming of buying medal bars and not listing in spelling class!!!!!
kunsho Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 And it is marked ?986? on the rim next to the ?se. I have always been of the impression that this is a first issue while the ?333?s? are second issue. Any ideas or comments are most welcome.Regards,Wild CardIs the "986" the only mark on the rim ? Are there probably one, or two other marks (a "F" between two antlers and/or a circle with a dot in the middle)? Attached you can see what I mean.Best RegardsMatthias
Stogieman Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Also remember guys that there are real-gold, higher content, with NO gold/maker stamps. The only way to determine is by weight.Scott, this is one to be very proud of, a rare gem in perfect "South-German" mounting style.
kunsho Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 (edited) ok...I do a little ahead now, without waiting wild cards response.The "986" and "F" (between antlers) marked medals are officially coined by the State Mint in Stuttgart with the original pre 1918 tools at the end of 1957. This very unique process was for replacement of lost pieces of the veterans (these pieces could only be issued against precise confirmation of bestowal of the golden bravery medal)...so this medal is an official ( - replacement) and a rare one.Best regardsMatthias Edited April 28, 2008 by kunsho
Wild Card Posted May 4, 2008 Posted May 4, 2008 Hello Kunsho,I apologize for this late response. This thread got away from me during some hectic times back here. My medal has only the ?986? mark; no ?F or antlers? and no circle with a dot in the middle either. Your information regarding these medals as being post war replacement pieces is quite fascinating, especially in view of the fact that they are such high gold content. It, to me anyway, reflects the high respect that these brave men were given, even long after the war.Thank you again and, again, I apologize for this late response.Best wishes,Wild Card
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now