
MajorBloodnok
Past Contributor-
Posts
45 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by MajorBloodnok
-
Austria-Hungary k.k. regimental histories
MajorBloodnok replied to David M's topic in Austro-Hungarian Empire
Hello David, I just wanted to highlight that dates of promotion are provided. I have been trying to find the website that provides all the "Schematismus" ..., "Milit?rschematismus", but just cannot locate it. Perhaps you can ask Mark C. He mentioned it. So long! Mike I -
Austria-Hungary k.k. regimental histories
MajorBloodnok replied to David M's topic in Austro-Hungarian Empire
Hi David, I have just acquired the "Schematismus" for 1905. As in most armies seniority of officers of the same rank is determined by the date of promotion. So the "Rangliste" in the "Schematismus" does give the dates of promotion! Kind regards, Mike -
Austria-Hungary KaiserJaeger, Kaiserschuetzen, Standschuetzen
MajorBloodnok replied to ccj's topic in Austro-Hungarian Empire
Hi Charles, I'm a k.u.k. enthusiast myself and have just spent a fortune on a couple of must-have books on the Austro-Hungarian Army. I suggest you try to get hold of: Lucas, James: The Fighting Troops of the Austro-Hungarian Army 1868 - 1914. It's available on AbeBooks.com for 88.52 $. Kind regards, Mike -
Hi, thanks for enlightening me. Campaign Medals are not my forte I must admit. I was aware that the senior French Para regiments had been raised that early, but I was only aware of the Foreign Legion's stand at Bir-Hakeim. Toujours en pointe! Have a nice weekend! Mike [WOULD-BE Legionnaire]
-
Famous battles...
MajorBloodnok replied to bigjarofwasps's topic in Great Britain: Research, Documentation & History
Hi Bobkohima, as your nickname suggests you simply had to remind all of us of the 4th Royal West Kents and their heroic defence of Kohima. A certain tennis court played a role I believe. Have a nice weekend, Mike -
Regimental Names
MajorBloodnok replied to Craig's topic in Great Britain: Research, Documentation & History
Sorry! Devonshire and Dorset Regiment! -
Regimental Names
MajorBloodnok replied to Craig's topic in Great Britain: Research, Documentation & History
Hi Barney, I believe it was Kaiser Bill himself who is credited with this quotation. Ludendorf did not yet hold a prominent General Staff position at the start of World War 1 sufficient to be deemed worth citing. Regards, Mike # -
Hi, Airborne units in North Africa in World War 2? More likely during the Algerian uprising in the 50s. Well, what about the Troupes Coloniales? Regards, Mike
-
Hi BJOW & Ed, Ed, I'm sorry but I have to disagree. I checked the relevant literature and this is the result: 1. F?silier-Regimenter (Fusilier Regiments) By OKH decree of 15th October 1942 all infantry regiments were re-styled "Grenadier-Regimenter". Those infantry regiments carrying on the traditions of Fusilier or Rifle Regiments of the old Imperial Army could apply to be named "F?silier-Regiment" or "Sch?tzen-Regiment". This resulted in the emergence of the following "F?silier-Regimenter": 22, 26, 27, 34, 68, 202, 230, 334 The named regiments "Feldherrnhalle" and "Gro?deutschland" received the honorary title of Fusiliers resulting in: F?silier-Regiment Feldherrnhalle; F?silier-Regiment-Gro?deutschland; Korps-F?silier-Regiment Gro?deutschland They retained infantry white as their Waffenfarbe plus their old regimental number. So their uniforms should not have changed at all. I checked "Davis" and could not find a distinguishing "F" for Fusiliers. There was no special sleeve cuff for Fusiliers. (Could not find one in "Davis" anyway.) 2. "Divisions-F?silier-Bataillone" (Divisional Fusilier Batallions) Now things are getting confusing! A restructuring of infantry divisions (n.A. 44 / new style 44) on the Eastern Front resulted in one "extra" divisional batallion. These "Divisions-Bataillone" were named "F?silier-Bataillone". The "Aufk?rungsabteilung der Division" (divisional reconnaissance unit) was either merged with this F?silier-Bataillon or when it did not exist upgraded to a F?silier-Bataillon. (26.07.1943) By decree of 1/9/43 these Divisions-F?silier-Bataillone were to be assigned the number of their respective division. Now it's time to get confused and baffled. We all know what Fusiliers are, don't we? By a decree of 23/2/44 the following 57 Divisions-F?silier-Bataillone were to by styled "Divisions- F?silier-Bataillon (A.A.) (= old style): 1, 6, 7, 11, 12, 15, 21 23, 24, 26, 30-32, 34.36, 45, 46 57, 58 62 65, 68, 69, 75, 94, 110-112, 121, 125, 134 168 170 171, 208, 227 254, 256, 257, 263, 269, 271, 299, 305, 329, 331, 333-335, 349, 352, 353, 356, 362, . 378. These Divisional "Fusilier" Batallions were assigned the tradition of former cavalry regiments! [A Divisional Fusilier Batallion was organised like a normal Grenadier batallion: 4 companies, including a heavy company.] This meant that these A.A. Divisional Fusilier Batallions were assigned the Kavallerie-Waffenfarbe Yellow! Consequently their sub-units were called "Schwadron" (squadron) and NOT Kompanie! Captains would be "Rittmeister" rather than Hauptmann and Feldwebel were called "Wachtmeister". To confuse us even more: The remaing Divsions-F?silier-Bataillone bore infantry white. But in addition 38 companies of these "infantry fusiliers" were also re-styled "Schwadrone" tasked with perpetuating the tradition of former imperial cavalry regiments! So "Divisions-F?silier-Bataillone" bore the number of their respective division. Their Waffenfarbe could be either white or yellow. The shoulder straps of the "infantry fusiliers" should have borne a distinctive letter to distinguish them from infantry regiments bearing the same number, perhaps "D" for divisional troops or their old "A" for Aufkl?rungsabteilung? The first company was equipped with bicycles. Questions remain. Kind regards, Mike
-
Hello BJOW, I fear you'll have to click on every single regiment or battalion in the list to find out. For example F?silier-Regiment 39 was re-formed after being annihilated in Russia and subsequently fought on the Western Front. Certain Infanterie-Regiments were re-named to establish a link with F?silier-Regiments of the old "Imperial Army" with the purpose of carrying on their regimental tradition. Also divisional reconnaissance units were re-organised as "Divisions-F?silier-Bataillone". Hope to be wiser tomorrow. Regards, Mike
-
Famous battles...
MajorBloodnok replied to bigjarofwasps's topic in Great Britain: Research, Documentation & History
Hi guys, a few more: 28th (North Gloucestershire) at Alexandria (1801) 3rd (Buffs) & 57th (Middlesex) at Albuhera (1811) 42nd (Black Watch) at Quatre Bras (1815) GUIDES at Delhi (1857) & Kabul (1879) 32nd (Cornwall Light Infantry) at Lucknow (1857) 24th (South Wales Borderers) at Isandlhwana [& Rorke's Drift] (1879) -
Useful k.u.k. Links see "WEBSITES": Useful Links!
-
Royal Welsh Fusiliers...
MajorBloodnok replied to bigjarofwasps's topic in Great Britain: Research, Documentation & History
Hi guys, Everyone knows that the British let the Americans win the War of Independence, because the Americans had treatened to start crying if they didn't! [source: BBC's Little Britain USA] How are things in the colonies? Mike -
Hi guys, welcome to the club. I was lucky to acquire an officer's shin-gunto in good condition at a reasonable price - 625 ?. That will have to remain my only acquisition as I already spend too much money on books! So long! Mike