Jump to content

GdC26

Active Contributor
  • Content Count

    759
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by GdC26

  1. Laurentius, I know both ribbons, and as far as I'm concerned, this is the St. Henry (and so, apparently, did Helmut, who handled the bar, unlike you and me) - so no need to show them, let's simply agree to disagree. All the more so since in this case, the final determination is quite irrelevant, since we both seem to agree the bar has issues.
  2. Its not a BZL but a St. Heinrich, but that doesn't change what I said before, that the bar is probably problematic (as the odd combination, the sequence and the absence of a DAK already suggested).
  3. I see white, not a discoloured blue, but I'm sure Luke can tell us one way or the other. I also see Helmut described the RAO ribbon as ..... a RAO ribbon and the St. Heinrich ribbon as just that, not as a discoloured BZL ribbon. If ribbon nr. 2 is a HT, the placement of that ribbon after the EK II but before another prussian award on war ribbon (which Helmut identifies as a HoH3X, but the device seems wrong for that) would be even weirder. And then there is still the unexplained absence of a DAK. Sorry, but the bar gives me no warm fuzzy feelings.
  4. I doubt you'll find him, because the ribbon bar looks problematic to me, as noted above - KOx or RAOx after a peacetime RAO? And even we look past the sequence issue, when would our man have earned the KOx or RAOx? Sure, our man had China service, but no other colonial service that would explain a RAO4X or KO4x. And no DAK, even though he served in 1897 and apparently in WWI? If real, it would take the skills and memory of the late Rick Research, the great inspirer of this forum, to trace him, I think. That will be interesting.
  5. Sorry for the mixup, Kriegsmarine Admiral. Looking at the bar again, I'm not even sure the St Heinrich is a St. Heinrich knights cross, which shouldn't have the swords. Frierdichsorden knight second class strikes me as too low an award for a Kapitän zur See, as I see from the screenshot he was from 1904 up to his appointment to Konteradmiral in 1916. So I might be wrong, but I just don't see it. Kind regards, Sandro
  6. Komtur, Maybe it's me, but I don't see a match between the list of Phillip's awards in your post and the ribbon bar shown. 4 seems to be Saxony, St Heinrich knight, 5 looks like Württemberg, Friedrichsorden knight 2nd class with swords. i see no evidence 2 ever had a crown or Schleife. 3 is a Kriegsorden but which is unclear to me, and in any event it strikes me 3 should precede 2. And where is the DAK? I could not find the bar on Helmut's site - did he explain the attribution in his original posting? Kind regards, Sandro
  7. Much as I like your thesis Simi, I'm not a 100% sold on it. The comparison with the other pic you've shown is problematic, because most of the uniform details are hidden by the Pelz worn in that photograph. More importantly, the Pelzmütze shown in the threadstarter seems to be of an altogether different type of those worn in the Napoleontic area, and could in fact be correct for the mid 19th century. I am traveling and don't have access to my books, do I had to resort to the internet - but if you study the plates below you'll see what I mean. Mind you, I'm not saying the thr
  8. And either way, in Sasha’s picture he is not wearing both the GC and a GC Kleinkreuz (avant la lettre, because in Prussia these only started to be worn during WWI, best I know).
  9. Tifes, the VM mark is not on the cros shown by 1812 Overture: that cross, as he stated, is unmarked, which is the very reason he posted it here for review.
  10. Why would the Duke wear two St Heinrich crosses, and if it is indeed a second St. Heirnichsorden, why does it have solid white cross arms and no blue ring around the centermedaillion? It seems to me it must be something else, although I have yet to identify it. Given the era, something French monarchical perhaps? I agree the center medallion seems to display a standing figure, and for moment considered the order of St. Louis, but don't think that is correct (wrong ribbon-color plus only given to catholics, as I understand it).
  11. I'll ask my friend to comment by reference to the pics you posted. As noted, he earlier told me that good, unmarked crosses do exist, but he asked for pics which you now have posted.
  12. That is of course correct Graham - but overture1812's question is about one without markings, which do exist, I gather, but pics will be needed to confirm authenticity or otherwise.
  13. Graham is right - please post pics. A good friend of mine who is very knowledgable on these says unmarked good grosses exist, but to be sure we (he) would need to see it.
  14. I think it is common courtesy to use such pics for personal reference only, and not post them as if they were your own - in the end, another fellow collector has paid for them. often handsomely. I know the perspective on this may differ from culture to culture, and I also realize copyright in pics posted on e-bay vests in the seller, not in the buyer. But I think it is a matter of etiquette not to post what you don't own when it comes to pics bought by others. With pics posted on open source references, the etiquette in my view is slightly different - those you can re-post as long as you
  15. Yes, compliments, very well done
  16. I saw these pics on a social media forum and share them here as I thought the might be of interest. Credits go to fellow member Andreas Schulze Ising and @Phil Slack
  17. I may have the MMJO booklet Christope, I just realized I bought and scanned a booklet like that last year. Can you post the pages if they are PDF,? If so, and if you send me your e-mail, I'll send you the scans for you to post.

    Best,

    Sandro

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. GdC26

      GdC26

      Perfect, thanks Christophe. I have two MJO booklets in my library that I thought I had scanned, but I cannot immediately find the scans. However, a promise is a promise, so I'll rescan at least one of the booklet's this weekend.  I'll do so in JPG, so it is easier for you to post.

      Best, 

      Sandro

    3. Deruelle

      Deruelle

      Hi Sandro,

      Waldo has sent me scans and I resize all pictures to be post here. I have in my library books from  Kramer, Schrettinger and I used to have the Bayern Goldene Ehrenbuch. I sold it years ago.

      Christophe

    4. GdC26

      GdC26

      OK, thanks for the heads up, Christophe. So no need for me to send you a scan, then, right (I'll make one for myself and GMU in any event, so if you want a PDF just let me know)? 

      Best, 

      Sandro

  18. What is it supposed to be? It certainly has a very unusual shape, plate and Feldzeichen look crude, and it seems to be a mixture of EM (cockarden, Feldzeichen) and officer rank (chin scales) items. Compare to: https://ageofkingsmilitaria.com/prussian-jaeger-officer-shako-ensemble-parade-with-original-case https://www.weitze.net/cgi-bin/suche/suche.pl?q=tschako Personally, I would pass on it. BTW, it is fairly easy (and actually fun and educational) to do this kind of research yourself. Simply check out some of the dealer sites will give you a feel of whether the item in ha
×
×
  • Create New...