Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    If we could ever crack the stories behind these medals, I think we'd get some interesting tales.

    Established 24 February 1959 to (quoting Dr. B, p. 65) ". . . award persons who rescue human lives from fire, flood, and other natural disasters, protect human lives, state and public property, and fight against crimes and vandalism, regardless of the risks posed to their own lives."

    Until 1967, the design had an unfortunate cross-like design on the obverse. The Soviets kindly suggested a change, evidence suggests.

    Types:

    -- Type 1.1 (?Cross? obverse, silver painted, 1959-??), Low = 10, High = 21

    -- Type 1.2 (?Cross? obverse, silver enameled, 19??-67), Low = 280, High = 381

    -- Type 2.1 (red obverse, silver numbered, 1967-??), Low = 1027, High = 1232

    -- Type 2.2 (red obverse, silver unnumbered, 19??--)

    Can someone show the first two? Types 2.1 and 2.2 follow.

    • Replies 88
    • Created
    • Last Reply

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Posted Images

    • 1 month later...
    Posted

    I am not assured about Variant 1.1 and Variant 1.3.The picture of Variant 1.3 is from Yuri Yashnev site http://www.netdialogue.com/yy/Asia/Mongoli...selfishness.htm and his medal has a number № 4 .I have same medal with number 8. I have painted variant of medal as well and it has a number 130, but I think now is this variant real old ? May be it's just a modern fake or may be another maker?

    Posted

    I have heard rumours that these medals are faked, but I have not received nor seen any concrete evidence. :(

    If anyone can shed some light on the matter, please do.

    jan

    Posted

    fakes of this medal are existing!

    the one i've seen was a cast medal and painted (the casting was not too bad - but was vissible because of the "casting-bubbles" and the tipical rim of casted medals)

    sadly i don't have a picture - but as the price of this medal is not so low, you'll notice it while you have a closer look at the medal before buying.

    christian

    • 1 month later...
    Posted (edited)

    back

    Thanks. What's the number on your "cross" variety? Sorry, aging eyes want to know and cannot decipher it from the scan.

    In fact, a close-up please. What is that "blob" in the centre??

    Edited by Ed_Haynes
    Posted

    Thanks. What's the number on your "cross" variety? Sorry, aging eyes want to know and cannot decipher it from the scan.

    In fact, a close-up please. What is that "blob" in the centre??

    188 for the one with the blob

    the other doesn't have a number

    also interesting to start looking at... the blob one (A40.2) has a U-ring as part of the medal whereas the other one (A40.4) has an O-ring also as part of the medal

    I have no clue what the blob is!

    • 2 months later...
    Posted

    fakes of this medal are existing!

    the one i've seen was a cast medal and painted (the casting was not too bad - but was vissible because of the "casting-bubbles" and the tipical rim of casted medals)

    sadly i don't have a picture - but as the price of this medal is not so low, you'll notice it while you have a closer look at the medal before buying.

    christian

    Yes this one is being faked, 100% for sure. Beware. Working to get some good comparative closeups. (Which means, I guess, that I'm working to find a fake to buy?)

    • 1 month later...
    • 2 months later...
    Posted

    And one more update:

    A 40.1/M 23.1 -- Type 1.1 (?Cross? obverse, silver painted) -- Low = 10/High = 76

    Type 1.2 (?Cross? obverse, silver enameled, green leaves) -- Low = 13/High = ??

    A 40.2/M 23.1 -- Type 1.3 (?Cross? obverse, silver enameled) -- Low = 249/High = 381

    A 40.3/M 23.1 -- Type 2.1 (red obverse, silver numbered) -- Low = 1027/High = 1232

    A 40.4/M 23.1 -- Type 2.2 (red obverse, silver unnumbered, escapee?)

    Posted (edited)

    Awarded 29 April 1999.

    When we can get research done, these could be very interesting awards.

    Edited by Ed_Haynes
    • 1 month later...
    Posted

    Type 1.2

    Actually quite an interesting one... only now do I realise somebody converted a pinback into a screwback!

    • 3 weeks later...
    Posted

    I thought I'd post a picture of the lowest known serial # of the type 2.1 and a 2.2 I just got in for the fun of it...

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now



    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.