Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    GdC26

    Patron
    • Posts

      958
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      6

    Everything posted by GdC26

    1. Many thanks Chuck, and my pleasure to share it. That is a nice one, too. It shows that hte shop at Friedrichstraße is in fact hte main one, and that the Under den Linden shop is merely a branch (Zweig-Geschäft). To me, that is a valuable piece of information I hadn't seen before. Here is a picture of Friedrichstraße store front, borrowed from the web. Kind regards, Sandro
    2. Just in. I hope those interested in phaleristics find it useful even if the orders shown are not lifelike photographs but either paintings or repainted photos. Scanning the catalogue I couldn't find a publication date, but based on the inclusion of the Südwestafrika-Denkmünze I'd place that between 1907 and 1914. The text on the opening page could be read to suggest that the booklet was issued on the occasion of the opening of J.H. Werner's shop at Friedrichstraße 173 in Berlin, but the venerable Sauerwald (Königlich Preussische Ordensjuweliere, page 145), seems to suggest that J.H. Werner operated shops at both Under den Linden and Friedrichstraße from 1891 onwards. Kind regards, Sandro
    3. Let's breathe some life into this interesting and now slightly dusty thread with a scan of (the second page of) an invoice from the estate of former Reichskanzler Michaelis, detaining Godet-Werner's prices for the sets listed. Unfortunately, page 1 of the invoice is missing, so its date is unclear, but Godet and Werner seem to have merged/started their cooperation in 1929 and Michaelis died in 1936, so the invoice will presumably date between 1929 and 1936 (and likely from between 1929 and 1933/34, as Michaelis will likely have had limited use for decorations of German states thereafter). See: https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12210 on the Godet/Werner cooperation/takeover. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Michaelis for further details on Michaelis, whose estate was sold by Carsten Zeige in 2001. Kind regards, Sandro
    4. No, but it shouldn't block your ability to read the post - just select the text with your mouse and you can red it (and react). Kind regards, Sandro +1
    5. Nick, I, for one, will be happy to pay a reasonable annual membership fee to keep up the site in its current, high quality form.Advertising is not a problem for me, nor is offering merchandise on the site. Have you given any thought to offering paying membership privileges/packages? I would need to think about what that could look like for this site, but I've seen it done in other areas (modeling, for example)? And is there mileage in cooperation with military museums in the UK or continental Europe (sponorship in return for, for example, research capacity)? Sorry if this is all still a bit vague - I'll give it further through and let you know if more concrete ideas pop up. Kind regards, Sandro
    6. One of the tragedies of our time: the confusion of opinion with fact. Which is why - next to handling good, accepted pieces with solid provenance - good references are a critical part of the hobby and a necessary investment - they show pages and pages of accepted contemporary variations, of Militärdienstzeichen for example, and even a few with eagles that fit within the center medallion of the cross ... BTW, the eagles on the long service cross of the 1st republic are very different to those of the threat-starter (no golden Vließ Kollane, for starters, no scepter and Reichsapfel, no crowns or pendillen and the republic's shield in the center .....) (picture courtesy of Richard Dawkins) Kind regards, Sandro
    7. For anyone seriously interested In imperial Austrian-Hungarian decorations: https://www.militaria.at/Book.aspx?book=4715040&Language=de https://www.militaria.at/Book.aspx?book=47567520&Language=en https://www.militaria.at/Book.aspx?book=3370752&Language=en Not flawless but close enough, and in any event better than some of the publicly available sources. And available in English for the price of only a few costly fakes ..... Kind regards, Sandro
    8. Nice thought, but you do know the "old gentleman", as you call him, managed to lose not just about every war he fought over the course of his long reign, but also his empire, right? Kind regards, Sandro
    9. RedNoseScout, (or Erik, as I understand), I understand your disappointment on the lack of applause, but this is forum I the tradition of Rick Research, so we deal in facts here. Based on the discussions so far, on the two badges you presented ihere recently (the Ppopov badge and the one under discussion here), I believe these facts are as follows: Both badges are contemporary originals (dixit Enzo, Tomas, Sandro); However, that is not what defines their value: that value lies in the engravings (dixit RedNoseScout, Enzo, Tomas, Sandro); Moreover, Tomas has handled the Popov badge and considered it bad, along with others who examined it at the time. The badge went unsold. The engraving on the Popov badge seems to be done by hand, the engraving on the badge shown here may be done by machine (dixit Simius Rex). Either way, even if both are hand engraved, hand engraving is not a final authenticator (disxit Enzo, Tomas, Sandro). The badge presented here shows exntsive recent sanding marks on the back that eradicated all patina. Those require explanation. One explanation could be that the badge was prepared for engraving (dixit Sandro). The engravings of both badges seem to contain little "glitches" that may be there on purpose, to avoid criminal liability for forgery (the "ö" in this badge, the "Serg. (if that is what is says as per RedNoseScout, Enzo and Kasle) in the other (dixit Sandro)). the historic context of the Popov badge requires explanation, especially if you, Enzo and Kale are correct on the "Serg.", because aviation iwas in its infancy in 1908 (the year mentioned in the engraving); there were few aviators and most were well known (dixit Tomas); and Russia and Austria were enemies in WWI, so it is hard to see why a 1917 Austrian aviation badge would bear a dedication to an (as yet: unknown) Russian aviation pioneer, or one that only started flying in 1909. Vince can speak for himself, but I think his conclusion was more cautious than you make it out to be. His exact words were: Hmmm, very interesting discussion. My knowledge of K.u.K badges is fairly weak, and I tend to avoid making any pronouncements due to the level of fakery. However, I'm going with my original feeling about this one, that the engraving is period and not some shambolic faker's attempt at enhancing value. Why this curious engraving is on this particular badge is certainly mysterious, but should not be dismissed outright. And whether Enzo's case and badge are mismatched is hardly relevant to the discussion of the badges you presented (but again Enzo can speak to that if he wishes). You and the dealer you refer to are absolutely correct that the best way to authenticate a piece is in hand inspection. In that sense, the forum is indeed limiting,. The problem with that argument for the Popov badge though is that it WAS inspected by Tomas and others when it hit the market (over) a decade ago, and was dismissed then as bad, by Tomas and others (as Tomas stated, it went unsold). On your last point, I don't consider or hold myself out as an expert on anything, but try to apply research, logic and reason to see if things add up. In this case, for the reasons set out above, I don't think they do, but as always. I'm absolutely open to rational debate. And as said, I fully understand your disappointment at the lack of applause: we all have made collecting-mistakes (God knows I have), or at least have had pieces in our collection criticized (God knows I have), but that does not define us. What defines us is how we deal with that. If there are points I have overlooked in the summary of facts above, or that could help explain matters feel absolutely free to raise them . This is an open debate, as far as I'm concerned, in the spirit of Rick Research: fact based, and with some humor if possible. There are no Gods here, and no hired hands - just people trying to learn. Kind regards, Sandro
    10. Nobody forced you to participate Luftmensch, and your contributions have mostly been personal attacks on those who disagreed with your central thesis, viz., "they don't engrave like they used to". So if you don't care to engage on the issues being debated (like the sanding marks on the back of this badge, or the "Ö" that casts doubt on the attribution to Fekete) and instead continue to prefer to cut into another member who dares to disagree with you, then maybe this indeed is not the forum for you. Plenty of alternatives without "Gentleman" in the name, so back to Facebook I say. Sincerely yours, Sandro
    11. I'm a bit with Tomas on this: not sure it would actually bring us back to the beginning. The badge itself is fairly common, its value lies in the engraving. The facts, then remain as Enzo and Tomas have stated (real badge, introduced in 1917; hand engraving in Russian; no Russians flew in the Austrian airfare in WW I; no discernible connection between the 1908 dated dedication and the badge or Austria). Whilst RedNoseScout is correct that there were frequent contacts between aviation ioneers in the first decade of the 20th century, there were not that many of them in 1908, And Tomas has noted that when the badge entered the market it went unsold and tha those who inspected it in hand dismissed it as bad. And then there are the small glitches in the engravings of the two badges under discussion, here and in a parallel thread, that seem to stand in the way of postive attribution: here, the middle name, in the other thread the "ö" that renders the attribution to Fedeke speculative. All of this could of course be coincidence, but at the very least, gives (me) reason for pause. Kind regards, Sandro
    12. Makes sense (as Simi's comments generally do). I think this also explains why the back of the wreath looks like it has been freshly sanded, and lacks all patina - compare with the badge posted by Enzo. Kind regards, Sandro
    13. Dear RedNoseScout, As I noted in the threat on the - let's call it the - Popov badge you posted, reading is an art. However personal you may want to take it, "Another sales pitch. I'm going to bed .... ? .... feel free to wake me up when something exiting happens ......" is a comment about your posts, which are filled with hyperbole like "I know of only four case engraved pilot badges of the central powers .... Two are pictured bellow." but tend to be thin on facts. You want to assess my knowledge, feel free to check out my posts and reputation on GMiC. By the way, in case you didn't notice - you may want to use some of the royalties from your upcoming books on a new keyboard, because your current one seems to be malfunctioning (try as you might, you can't type my name right and your message seems ..... garbled)? Kind regards (we're after all all gentlemen here, even if not all of us seem to be aware of it), Sandro
    14. Another sales pitch. I'm going to bed .... ? .... feel free to wake me up when something exiting happens ......
    15. As said, reading is an art. Tomas just confirmed that he mistyped, and that it is in fact December 1909, as the Wikipedia link he added confirms. In a free Google translation of: "В 1909 году он уехал во Францию, где стал работать механиком в авиашколе, созданной братьями Райт под Парижем, что позволяло ему проводить целые дни на аэродромеЖювизи под Парижем. Получив первые уроки лётного мастерства у шеф-пилота и первого ученика школы Райтов графа Шарля де Ламбера, француза, сына русского подданного, он 13 декабря 1909 года совершил свой первый самостоятельный вылет на аэроплане «Райт». Первый полёт длился недолго: из за неправильного движения рулями Попов опустился слишком резко и довольно сильно расшибся. Пострадал и аэроплан. Это, однако, не обескуражило Николая Евграфовича. Через месяц, оправившись от ран и ушибов, он вновь устремился в небо. " "In 1909, he left for France, where he began working as a mechanic in an aviation school set up by the Wright brothers near Paris, which allowed him to spend whole days at the Juvisy airfield near Paris. Having received his first flying lessons from the chief pilot and the first student of the Wright school, Count Charles de Lambert, a Frenchman, the son of a Russian citizen, on December 13, 1909, he made his first solo flight on a Wright airplane. The first flight did not last long: due to incorrect movement of the rudders, Popov sank too sharply and hurt himself quite badly. The aircraft was also damaged. This, however, did not discourage Nikolai Evgrafovich. A month later, having recovered from wounds and bruises, he again rushed into the sky." But hey, what are facts for if not to bend them to fit the story ....? And why actually read what those heretics say anyway ...? Kind regards, Sandro
    16. Thanks Tomas. I was referring to the sentence "He flew solo for the first time in December 1908" in one of your earlier posts, but gather you mistyped. Which makes the "1908" reference on the badge something of a riddle again. and the badge itself an article of faith .... Kind regards, Sandro
    17. "Maybe" .....? And "we may never be able to .... tie all data points" ? Thanks for proving my point about the speculative nature of your assertions on this particular badge better than I ever could, dear Luftmensch. The known facts, however, are as stated earlier: "1) the Luftfaherabzeichen is original; 2) The engraving is done by hand." The rest, as we all seem to acknowledge, is speculation and belief, at least on the info before us. I drew the same conclusion several posts ago, so there we are: full circle .... Kind regards, Sandro Ps- had you actually read any of Tomas' posts, you might have noted that December 1908 was the date of Popov's first flight. For you, that is probably further proof of your beliefs, for me, it hardly is.
    18. I know, reading and logical reasoning are arts not mastered by all. Still, that is what this forum is all about - drawing conclusions on the basis of confirmed facts and logic, whilst keeping an open mind. It's a juggle, but you perhaps you can try it some time. It seems this threat has run its course (RedNoseScout and you have not contributed a single relevant fact for a while now), but it will be my pleasure to engage again when you have anything to contribute beyond "they don't engarave like they used to". Oh, on logical though, regarding your last point in response to Tomas' observations - I'm confused, so your contention is that airship steersmen in French service in WWI were given the Austrian Luftfahrerabzeichen? And all of that relates to 1908 how? The mind boggles .... Kind regards as always, Sandro
    19. Here’s a shocker: I may not be able to show you a second example of the Shroud of Turin, yet many scientists believe, on the evidence available, that the one example that is known is a medieval forgery. Only the faithful think differently. Hyperbole aside, your approach to scientific debate is fundamentally flawed. There are many pieces on the market that have been spiced up through engravings and by other means. That goes for Austrian decorations as well (just have a look at the many dedicated Austrian, English, Italian etc. medals on the market, for example, some legit, some doubtful, many hand engraved). You don’t recognize that practice, I fear for your collection. Anyway, it is clear you’re not a man of your word - I did what you asked (acknowledge that I don’t know) and you’re not impressed …. ? As said, time to move on. If you’re the current or past owner of this badge (which given your attitude, strikes me as distinctly possible): I hope you enjoy it, and can forgive those of lesser faith. Kind regards, Sandro
    20. Ok, so this is now a glorified book-ad. Indeed, time to move on as Tomas said. Personally, as a skeptic, I though Tomas “first flight in December 1908” point might capture the attention of tho faithful, and give them something to examine further, but I see I’m wrong on that, and we’re now in “buy my book and all will be revealed” land. ? Given the quality of input provided so far, and it’s speculative nature, I’ll probably pass on that (my loss, I know). However, do feel free to wake me up if there is more info on the provenance or history of the badge. Kind regards, Sandro
    21. Indeed I don’t, and neither do you, Luftmensch. All you have is faith, faith I am indeed lacking. Kind regards, Sandro ps 1 - it’s “Occam’s raZor”. I wasn’t going to raise that, but now that you insist on repeating the error in a reference that somehow seems to upset you, let’s at least ensure proper spelling going forward. ps 2 - now that I have impressed “the heck out of” you, take deep breath and see this discussion for what it is: just a clash of ideas and perspectives (even if some are indeed better founded than others). ps 3 - research into the Austro-Hungarian/Russian connection might start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aviation_pioneers Rather than basking in faith, I spent some time going to the list and found no obvious connections, but with time and patience, who knows. As said repeatedly, I’m keeping an open mind (another way of saying “I don’t know”?), even if I’m skeptical.
    22. It strikes me that hese are the issues to be resolved. Latching on to the 1908 date doesn't resolve them (in fact, according to Tomas, Popov in 1908 was just an engineer, and started to fly only in 1908), nor does emphasizing that the skill of hand engraving is dying out, or that in 40 years of collecting (most of us, including myself, meet that threshold, not that it means much) you have never seen a similarly forged badge. Identification of an Austrian aviator who attended the Wright brother's Paris' flight school and who served in the war as an aviator and survived it might, as might establishing when this badge first hit the market (if that was ten years ago when the Russian collection market was extremely hot, that could certainly be a red flag - Popov may not be well known in the West, but that may be different in Russia). Any evidence on those issues could perhaps help to progress this discussion on the facts, rather than on conviction and belief. Kind regards, Sandro
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.