-
Posts
29,251 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
84
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by Chris Boonzaier
-
Pretty stupid soldier....
Chris Boonzaier replied to Chris Boonzaier's topic in Modern Campaigns and Conflicts
-
EK 1914 EK1 ScrewBack Marked 800
Chris Boonzaier replied to Nick's topic in Germany: All Eras: The Iron Cross
Only difference the 800 stamps? -
EK 1914 AWS type 3 core.......4 bolt version
Chris Boonzaier replied to Motorhead's topic in Germany: All Eras: The Iron Cross
Hi, I think Trevor and Micha are both right up there when it comes to 1914 EK experts... and I think they each have their own Classification system. best Chris -
I found this little gem on Ebay.... the ribbon is quite wide if i had found a length i would have assumed for Austrian mounting... As you can see, it clips over and it could be clipped around a ribbon bar or something.... is it some kind of Austrian mounting system for wearing a ribbon?
-
How long does it take you to do one of those?!?!?!?!?!?!!
-
Ooooppss... you did a funny streak on his cheek!! ;-) Fantastic!
-
Thats fantastic! I have an interesting document somewhere, it was the original vorschlag that went up top the brigade with the approval for one guys award, and turning down another guys... the guy whose award was approved was in the Stab, and kept the vorschlag... quite unique... I must dig it out...
-
EK 1914 The makers marks....
Chris Boonzaier replied to Chris Boonzaier's topic in Germany: All Eras: The Iron Cross
P.S. there are a number of Guess lists doing the rounds, matching Company names to initials.... Does anyone have any to post? Or links? -
EK 1914 flat vs. vaulted
Chris Boonzaier replied to Eric Stahlhut's topic in Germany: All Eras: The Iron Cross
Indeed... but that would likely mean, when it came to selling grandfathers group, his award flatback would probably be there.. more likely than his domed wearing one.... -
I still have a bit of a problem drawing boundries here.... Issue ones are easiest... apparently pinned flatbacks, (Mostly with makers initial?) no probleme here Private Purchase, It is said that domed crosses are private purchase.... ok, but how do we recognise a flatback private purchase (How often did people buy flatback private purchase crosses?) Lets say firm XX and YY were making private purchase crosses in 1916.... and still in 1930... there is nothing to say their 1930 crosses will be any different than their 1916 crosses, either in material or quality.... so how do we differentiate between war time private purchase and a post war crosses... How many crosses are 100% identifyable as Post war... as opposed to private purchase? Can we say most post war crosses are of lesser quality? Why would they be? The same fine firms were making them.... what would make them drop in quality between the wars? So, can we say, Non Issue fall into 1) Private purchase, both wartime and postwar where it is not sure when they were made and 2) A handfull of positively identifiable post war... LDO- We look down on LDO 1914 crosses, but they are technically as official as a WW1 Issue cross if gotten through official channels? Any thoughts to issue, post war , private purchase etc?