Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Imperial German Non Combatant Officer’s Medal Bar


    Recommended Posts

    Detlef, see here: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php/topic/10702-1870-non-combatant-iron-cross-officers-medal-bar/

    Certainly a very impressive looking bar; but I am curious as to why

    the Hohenzollern is mounted before the Red Eagle and Crowns.

    Is this correct?

    Yes, that's how they should be in this classes - it only were the other way round if the HOH were a 4th class. The 3rd class outranks any Prussian piece time order.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Detlef,

    some questions : where is the long service medal. With an impressive bar like that, I'm esthonished that such medal is not present here.

    Another question : why there is two crown order medals, even if the ribbons are different ?

    About the commemorative medal of 1870-1871 war, the ribbon looks differents than usual ? But I'm not specialist of this aera, I will wait for expert's answers

    Christophe

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The is a non-combattants bar and I do not believe that he was an army officer. I think he was an official and therefore did not have the officier long service cross.

    He should be easy to trace by the noncom EK2 (1870) alone!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello all:

    I know some of the history of this group prior to the year 2000 and personally inspected it many years ago. In the 1970's it was a featured sale item of Ernst Blass. The RAO III. with Crown is a horrid quality bronze-gilt "spangenstuck" if I remember correctly. All of the ribbons appear to be old however. Although impressive looking, somewhat of a mystery to all who have ever owned it.

    Best regards

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Although impressive looking, somewhat of a mystery to all who have ever owned it.

    Though some people did really try hard, a possible wearer could not yet be found - which is pretty odd with such a bar.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am now really wondering whether this bar might be in fact realistic, but in reality just a put together piece (because no one can identify it).

    Could this be also the reason that this bar changed its owner so often in the past?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, that's how they should be in this classes - it only were the other way round if the HOH were a 4th class. The 3rd class outranks any Prussian piece time order.

    Thank you Saschaw - very interesting.

    Live and learn.

    :cheers:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would like to hold it in my hands for a proper inspection. I have some serious doubts about it.

    It might be that the bar alone os real, but single decorations are at least partly exchanged.

    Why?

    - the Red Eagle is a crappy "wearers copy" - the Hohenzollern seems to be golden; why to put one awarded piece and one self purchased next to each other??

    - the Ernestinian looks silver gilt, at that time it should have been awarded I would expect a solid golden one

    - the Saxon albert knight 2nd class seems to be a quite low class on that bar. Usually foreigners got one step higher than native Saxons that time, so I would at least expect a knight 1st.

    Greetings

    Daniel

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Daniel:

    The HHO is NOT gold. It is gilded-silver if I remember correctly. The SEHO piece is gilded silver. There are no gold awards on this bar which does not make sense for this time period.

    Best regards

    I would like to hold it in my hands for a proper inspection. I have some serious doubts about it.

    It might be that the bar alone os real, but single decorations are at least partly exchanged.

    Why?

    - the Red Eagle is a crappy "wearers copy" - the Hohenzollern seems to be golden; why to put one awarded piece and one self purchased next to each other??

    - the Ernestinian looks silver gilt, at that time it should have been awarded I would expect a solid golden one

    - the Saxon albert knight 2nd class seems to be a quite low class on that bar. Usually foreigners got one step higher than native Saxons that time, so I would at least expect a knight 1st.

    Greetings

    Daniel

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My problems with this bar are a little more basic. However I agree with all of the "deeper" responses.

    I look at this bar and at a simple first glance find it impossible to accept as authentic for two reasons:

    A) I have never seen a professionally made German medal bar of this caliber that did not have precisely identical and perfect ribbon mounts.

    B) The bright color/brand new look of the ribbons alone on a bar of this era make me cringe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Auction result: 3.200 pounds...rather disappointing, or?

    Yup :whistle:

    If there would be any chance for this bar to be an original one, the result should be much more then double!

    I once had a dream :sleep:

    Regards, Komtur.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • 4 weeks later...

    As wrote before by SaschaW:

    1.) The HOH3 is made definitively after 1930

    2.) There is NO person to be found in the Königlich Preußischen Ordenslisten with a combination of EK21870w/HOH3/RAO3Kr/KO4EB. To prevent a discussion of a "lost" red cross on the KO4: there is also NO person to be found with the combination of these decorations with a KO4GK.

    Only because of these two points there is no chance for this bar to be an original one. Besides of this, there are some other reasons ...

    Regards, Komtur.

    Edited by Komtur
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I read the so-called identification of the HOH3 by a member here. Basically, he said that he saw a picture of it, and declared unilaterally that it is a post 1930 piece. That's it. No explanation of why he thinks the HOH3 is post 1930. Who has held this piece in his hand and evaluated it? Not many, I should think. People who talk in Absolutes and who use words like "Definitely" about a tricky subject like this should maybe try to take a more analytical and scientific approach.

    Hello:

    I have personally inspected this item and I concur 100% with the comments made by the very experienced collector/dealer who made the comments regarding the HHO3 and determined that it is a post-1930 piece.

    Best regards

    Edited by Schießplatzmeister
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.